Uttarakhand High Court
FA/29/2024 of SNEHA Vs DEVENDRA YADAV on 27 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. RAVINDRA MAITHANI AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. ALOK MAHRA First Appeal No. 29 of 2024 27th October, 2025 Sneha ………Appellant Versus Devendra Yadav ….…Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. RAVINDRA MAITHANI AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. ALOK MAHRA First Appeal No. 29 of 2024 27th October, 2025
Sneha
………Appellant Versus Devendra Yadav ….…Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Oral: Ravindra Maithani, J.
The instant appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 14.09.2023 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Vikasnagar, Dehradun in Case No. 196 of 2021, by which an application filed by respondent under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been decreed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that parties have arrived at a settlement and settlement has already been filed in a proceedings under Section 498-A IPC in the concerned court. Learned counsel would further submit that the respondent has already paid Rs. 1,00,000/- to the appellant and a cheque of Rs. 1,70,000/- is being paid today and the remaining amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- shall be paid by
the respondent in the proceedings under Section 498-A IPC.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he has received a cheque amounting to Rs. 1,70,000/-, but, it always remains subject to the bank honouring the cheque.
5. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
6. Permission is granted.
7. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
27.10.2025
Ujjwal