Uttarakhand High Court
FA/1/2020 of KULDEEP PANWAR Vs SEEMA PANWAR on 27 October 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Appeal No.1 of 2020 Kuldeep Panwar …… Appellant Vs. Smt. Seema Panwar ……Respondent Presence: Mr. M. K. Goyal, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Pawan Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent. Coram:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2025:UHC:9430-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Appeal No.1 of 2020
Kuldeep Panwar
…… Appellant Vs. Smt. Seema Panwar
……Respondent
Presence: Mr. M. K. Goyal, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Pawan Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent.
Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The challenge in this appeal is made to the judgment and order dated 30.11.2019 passed in Original Suit No.219 of 2017, Kuldeep Panwar Vs. Smt. Seema Panwar, by the court of Judge, Family Court, Dehradun. By the impugned judgment, a petition seeking divorce by the appellant under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been dismissed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the file.
3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have already amicably settled the dispute on 13.09.2025 in the National Lok Adalat, terms whereof have also been reduced into writing and signed by both the parties.
4. In fact, the case record reveals that in the National Lok Adalat, both the parties have arrived at a settlement and their terms have already been reduced into writing, which has been signed by learned counsel for the parties also.
2
2025:UHC:8715-DB
5. Earlier, when the matter was taken up, the Court requested the learned counsel for the parties to request the parties to join the proceedings through V.C. so that the compromise that has been arrived at between the parties in the National Lok Adalat could be verified. Now, at 2:30 pm, when the matter is taken up, the appellant and the respondent joined the proceedings through V. C. and both of them have been identified by their respective counsel. They have accepted and verified the compromise that has been recorded in the National Lok Adalat.
6. Since the parties have amicably settled the dispute, the appeal is decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The compromise, which was recorded in the National Lok Adalat, shall form part of the order.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 27.10.2025
27.10.2025
BS BALWANT SINGH Digitally signed by BALWANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=fbbd191c8bdb8b16e8ca7937deaf72a17c02fe2eacbf28cdf4 ba7ce8640c5820, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=04E141DF4614F9A4D5F48346EB553DE5185F418755 DC00A7A13C14A680C3FA90, cn=BALWANT SINGH Date: 2025.10.28 16:51:48 +05'30'