Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/1278/2025 of MAMTA ARYA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 12 August 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 01 WPSS No.1278 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. M.K. Chand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Bisht, Additional C.S.C. for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 01
WPSS No.1278 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. M.K. Chand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Bisht, Additional C.S.C. for the State. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner claims family pension. When the matter was taken up on 01.08.2025, this Court has noted that respondent
Engineer, Lohaghat, District Champawat, has admitted that the petitioner is eligible for family pension, but due to inter- departmental communication, the pension could not be paid to her. On that date, the Court requested the respondent no.3/Executive Engineer, Lohaghat, District Champawat, to join the proceedings of this Court. Today, Mr. Hitesh, the Executive Engineer, Lohaghat, District Champawat, has joined the proceedings through video conferencing. He submits that the claim of the petitioner has been admitted and the bills have already been forwarded to the Treasury, and the petitioner has been communicated about it. The Court takes on record the statement given by respondent
Engineer, Lohaghat, District Champawat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bills have already been sent to the treasury, and now nothing survives in this writ petition. In view of it, the writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
12.08.2025 RV