Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/452/2024 of VINAY SHARMA Vs SANDEEP SINGH on 16 July 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CLCON No.452 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. K.H. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Digvijay Nath Dubey and Mr. Jagdish Singh Bisht,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
CLCON No.452 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. K.H. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Digvijay Nath Dubey and Mr. Jagdish Singh Bisht, Advocates for the respondents. In the instant contempt petition, the petitioner has brought to the notice of the Court the wilful disobedience of order dated 03.09.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WPSB No.549 of 2024, Vinay Sharma vs. Sandeep Singh and another, by which the order of suspension of the petitioner was stayed. On 31.12.2024, notices were issued to the respondents, whereby respondents had to file their response. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that compliance of the order dated 03.09.2024 passed in the first petition has already been done by the respondents and nothing survives in the contempt petition. Learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 submits that no contempt was done by the respondents. The Court had passed the order on 03.09.2024 in first petition and on 04.09.2024, it was duly complied with by the respondents. The Court takes on record the statement given by the learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the statement given by the learned counsel for the parties, nothing survives in the contempt petition. It stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
16.07.2025 Ravi