Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2117/2025 of MADARSA DARUL ULOOM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 16 July 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 3S WPMS No. 2117 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 3S
WPMS No. 2117 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1, 3, 4 and
5. Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the respondent no.2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is owner of the property which was illegally sealed by the respondents authority on 03.03.2025 without affording an opportunity of hearing to him. The petitioner seeks direction that the property of the petitioner may be permanently unsealed. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the premises of the petitioner has been illegally sealed without affording an opportunity of hearing to him; the petitioner will not run any Madarsa or any Educational centre in the premises, unless he is authorized to do so by the State Government. Learned State counsel submits that if the petitioner gives such undertaking, the petition may be disposed of in terms thereof. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State counsel. The writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction to the respondents authority to unseal the premises in question, subject to the petitioner giving an undertaking that he will not run any Madarsa or Educational Centre in the premises, unless he is authorized to do so by the State Government. In case the petitioner makes any defiance to the undertaking given by him, the respondents authority shall be free to take such action, as is permissible under law.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 16.07.2025 Jitendra