Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/1127/2025 of RIYASAT Vs THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 30 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/29 WPMS No.1127 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/29

WPMS No.1127 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Heard. It is the case of the petitioners that a suit has been filed for evicting them from a land which, according to the respondents, belong to the Gram Sabha. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners are ready to handover the possession of the land. They seek time and for that purpose they have filed representation before the District Magistrate, Haridwar. The petitioners seek directions that the District Magistrate, Haridwar may be directed to dispose of the representation and the petitioners may be granted eight months’ time to vacate the land. Learned State counsel would submit that the representation given by the petitioners to the District Magistrate, Haridwar, which is Annexure No.2 to the writ petition, may be decided within a period of four weeks. The Court takes on record the statement given by the learned State counsel. The petition stands disposed of with the direction to the District Magistrate, Haridwar to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure No.2 to the writ petition) within a period of four weeks. Till then, the petitioners may not be evicted from the land-in-question.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 30.04.2025 Sanjay

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead