Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/968/2025 of MOHAMMAD AAMIR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 2 April 2025
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 28 WPMS No.968 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Vikas Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 28
WPMS No.968 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Vikas Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Bhupendra Singh Bisht, Advocate for the respondent no.3. Heard. It is the case of the petitioners that they were street vendors; their shops have been removed from the place where they were sitting; the respondent no.3, Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital, had assured that they would be provided some other place for vending, but despite representation having been made, it has not been done. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are not being provided the alternate place for sitting and vending. The petitioners had made a representation, which is Annexure No.7 to the writ pettition. Therefore, directions may be issued so that the representation may be decided. Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 would submit that the representation that has been made by the petitioners shall be decided within four weeks from today. The petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondent no.3 that if such representation(s) is made by the petitioners, the same shall be decided within a period of four weeks by the respondent no.3, in accordance with the law/guidelines.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
02.04.2025 RV