Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/532/2025 of AFJAAL AHMAD Vs UNION OF INDIA on 6 March 2025
Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.532 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mohd. Shaify, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS No.532 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mohd. Shaify, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Central Government Standing Counsel for the Union of India/respondent nos.1 & 2. The petitioners claim that they have wrongly been expelled as Directors of the respondent no.5 M/S Sasa Metal Works Pvt. Ltd. (“the company”). There are allegations that fraud were played so as to exclude the petitioners from the Directorship of the company. Other related reliefs have also been sought by the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that a fraud was played by the respondent nos.3 and 4 by forging the e-mail address of the petitioners and thereby excluded from the list of Directorship, of which, multiple applications were filed by the petitioners, but the respondent no.2 is not taking action on it. He would refer to Annexure No.21, the last application that was made on 26.05.2024. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2, under instruction, would submit that the application will be decided within a period of two months. The Court takes on record the statement of learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2, nothing survives in this petition. It stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 06.03.2025 Sanjay