MR PIYUSH GUPTA vs CANARA BANK on 5 February 2026

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW

<table border="1"><thead><tr><th data-bbox="95 145 275 195">Date of order or proceeding</th><th data-bbox="275 145 725 195">Order with signature of court</th><th data-bbox="725 145 865 195">Office action taken with date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td data-bbox="95 195 275 942">M.A. No.150/2024<br/>05.02.2026<br/>SL. No.48</td><td data-bbox="275 195 725 942"><p>Shri Deepak Singh Salhipore, Ld.<br/>Counsel for the applicant is present.</p><p>Shri Vinod Kumar Srivastava, Ld.<br/>Counsel for the respondent bank is present.</p><p>This M.A. has been filed by the applicant for setting aside / recalling of the order dated 03.04.2024 passed in O.A. No.1155 of 2022. This M.A. has been filed by the applicant on 19.10.2024 after a lapse of six months.</p><p>The applicant's lawyer stated that the lawyer appointed on that date had not properly briefed the applicant regarding filing the written statement, and when another lawyer was subsequently appointed, they became aware of the order dated 17.09.2024.</p><p>I find that; it is not a cogent reason for recalling the final order dated 03.04.2024.</p><p>I find that any cogent reason has not been assigned for filing M.A. with delay. Accordingly, the M.A. is dismissed.</p><p>Let the file be consigned to record room.</p><p>However, the applicant is at liberty to approach the respondent bank for a proper settlement.</p><p>Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website.</p><p>(Dictated)</p><p>(Pravas Kumar<br/>Presiding Officer)</p><p>(Mugish)</p></td><td data-bbox="725 195 865 942"></td></tr></tbody></table>