SAURABH PANDEY vs UNION BANK OF INDIA on 6 February 2025

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW

<table border="1"><thead><tr><th data-bbox="156 183 314 211">Date of order or proceeding</th><th data-bbox="314 183 714 211">Order with signature of court</th><th data-bbox="714 183 828 211">Office action taken with date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td data-bbox="156 211 314 899">M.A. No.05/2024<br/>06.02.2025<br/>Sl. No.06</td><td data-bbox="314 211 714 899"><p>I have heard Ld. Counsels for the parties.</p><p>It has been submitted on behalf of the applicant that the application for restoration which is MA No.05/2024 in para No.5.2 that the SA No.349/2020 was fixed for hearing on 11.8.2023 and the earlier counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant got delayed a fraction of second and thereafter the Secretary of this Tribunal has been contacted as such he has advised to move an application, but, counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant was fractured as such he was not in a position to write in his own hand as such he gone to Civil Court and came back by 5:30 pm.</p><p>Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the counsel who was appearing on that day was delayed and could not appear before the Tribunal. But, the name of counsel has not been disclosed. There is no affidavit of that by that particular counsel who himself got delayed. The affidavit has been filed in the SA is of Saurabh Pandey who is the applicant who has no occasion to know the aforesaid fact and source of knowledge of the aforesaid fact has been disclosed in</p></td><td data-bbox="714 211 828 899"></td></tr></tbody></table>

*Kumari*

Continued..... Page No.02 M.A. No.05/2024

verification clause, as such, the present Misc. Application cannot be allowed, accordingly, it is **dismissed**.

Let the file be consigned to record room.

Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website.

(Kaushlendra Yadav) Presiding Officer Additional Charge