GIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD vs SMT MANJU on 1 September 2025

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW

<table border="1"> <thead> <tr> <th data-bbox="111 121 288 153">Date of order or proceeding</th> <th data-bbox="288 121 714 153">Order with signature of court</th> <th data-bbox="714 121 874 153">Office action taken with date</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td data-bbox="111 153 288 925"> M.A.No.51/2025<br/> 01.9.2025<br/> SI No.33 </td> <td data-bbox="288 153 714 925"> <p>Mr. N. Chandranshul, Ld.<br/> Counsel for the applicant is present.</p> <p>Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that service is sufficient upon the respondent.</p> <p>It is submitted that in the MA vide order dated 08.4.2025 while disposing of SA No.651/2022, this Tribunal observed in following manner:</p> <p><i>"Ld. Counsel for the respondent-bank submits that account in question has been settled and closed".</i></p> <p>It is submitted that in fact SA was withdrawn by the applicant and the account in question has not been settled.</p> <p>None appeared for the respondent, <del>even after notice</del></p> <p>In view of fact <del>and</del> in the SA No.651/2022 the word "account in question has been settled and closed is deleted."</p> <p>SA No.651/2022 has been disposed of and this MA is accordingly <del>dismissed</del> <del>allowed</del> <del>and disposed</del>.</p> <p>Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website.</p> <p style="text-align: right;">(Dictated)</p> <p style="text-align: right;">(Pravas Kumar Singh)<br/> Presiding Officer</p> </td> <td data-bbox="714 153 874 925"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

(Veeresh)