RAHUL MAINI vs INDIAN BANK on 4 September 2025

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW

<table border="1"><thead><tr><th data-bbox="115 171 288 228">Date of order or proceeding</th><th data-bbox="291 171 738 228">Order with signature of court</th><th data-bbox="741 171 875 228">Office action taken with date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td data-bbox="115 231 288 976">M.A. No.48/2023<br/>04.09.2025<br/>SL. No.73</td><td data-bbox="291 231 738 976"><p>None appears for the applicant.</p><p>Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank wants to file written objection.</p><p>I find that this MA has been filed by the applicant for recall of the ex-parte judgment dated 19.09.2022 by which the O.A. has been decreed as even after service the applicant did not appear.</p><p>I find that this MA has been brought by the applicant on 12.03.2023 that is after lapse of the period as date of knowledge is concerned. It is stated that in para 7 of this petition that on 10.12.2022 the applicant came to know regarding the order he contacted the lawyer, but the MA has been filed after lapse of the period.</p><p>Since the judgment was passed on 19.09.2022 and MA has been brought on 16.03.2023.</p><p>I find that MA is time barred.</p><p>Today none appears for the applicant.</p><p>The MA is dismissed on merit as well as for non-prosecution.</p><p>Let the file be consigned to record room.</p><p>Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website.</p><p style="text-align: right;">(Dictated)</p><p style="text-align: right;">(Pravas Kumar Singh)<br/>Presiding Officer</p></td><td data-bbox="741 231 875 976"></td></tr></tbody></table>