Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
SRI PRAMOD vs ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE on 2 January 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
Present: A.H. Khan, Presiding Officer
Dated of order 02.01.2024
M.A. No.21 of 2018
SL No.68
**Present:-**
<table border="1"><tr><td>Counsel for the applicant</td><td>Mr. Alind Kumar Dixit</td></tr><tr><td>Counsel for the respondent-bank</td><td>Mr. Shyam Kumar Gupta</td></tr></table>
Counsel for the respondent-bank raised objection on maintainability of the M.A. He submits that despite sufficient service, the defendants did not appeared before this tribunal to contest the O.A., hence, the same was decided as ex-parte.
Counsel for the applicant filed this M.A. to recall the ex-parte order passed by this tribunal. He submits that M.A. is well within limitation from the date of intimation.
Heard counsel for the parties.
Perusal of record reveals that, the M.A. is time barred and the applicant has failed to explain the delay occurred in filing of the M.A., therefore, the present Misc. Application moved by the applicant is dismissed being time barred.
Let the file be consigned to record.
(A.H. Khan) Presiding Officer