UCO BANK vs MR. NITAY DUTTA & ORS. on 9 January 2026

Order Sheet Case No. TA 4 of 2014 UCO BANK -VS- MR. NITAY DUTTA & ORS. Date of the Order Order with Signature Office action date and da Signature Parties wh necessar 9.1.2026 (Sl. No. 13) Ms. Farida Yasmin. … For the Applicant Bank. Learned Advocate for the Applicant Bank appears and is pressing the withdrawal petition. In the above said application it was stated that the applicant has filed a recovery application for recovery of a sum of Rs.12,83,161/- including interest and other reliefs. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings there has been a settlement between the parties and the Bank has received Rs.3,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of the dues. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by Ms. Nitu Kumari, the Senior Manager of the Bank and her signature is identified by advocate on record. Learned advocate for the applicant bank also prays for refund of application fees. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the TA defendants if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant TA and any other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. The Applicant Bank is entitled for refund of Court Fee in terms of the Rules for which the applicant may move before the learned Registrar of this Tribunal who may take decision in accordance with rules and regulations of the subject. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer ac