Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

UCO BANK vs KUMAR KANTI CHAKRABORTY & ORS on 3 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Rina S.

BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I KOLKATA

PRESENT: -SHRI AMBUJA MOHAN DAS

PRESIDING OFFICER

T.A. No.322 of 2014

DATE OF DELIVERY OF ORDER :3rd February,2026

UCO BANK, Shibpur Branch, address of registered office is at 170, G. T.

Road (South), P.O.- Shibpur, Howarh – 711102.

..........................Applicant

-Vs-

1.

Mr. Kumar Kanti Chakraborty, address is at 91/1 Dewangazi Road, Pathakpara, Bally, Howrah - 711201 and at 18/16/2B, Fern Road (Ground Floor), Kolkata – 700019 and at 52/4, Panchanantala Road, Bally, Howrah – 711201.

2.

Mrs. Madhumita Chakraborty, address is at 91/1 Dewangazi Road, Pathakpara, Bally, Howrah – 711201.

3.

Mr. Dinesh Mishra, address is at 57, Dewangazi Road, Pathakpara, Bally, Howrah – 711201.

4.

Mrs. Anita Mishra, address is at 57, Dewangazi Road, Pathakpara, Bally, Howrah – 711201.

....................Defendants

Counsel for the Applicant Bank:Ms. Farida Yasmin Counsel for the Defendants: None appears.

Set ex-parte on 13/01/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

J U D G M E N T

1. The present Recovery Application is filed by the UCO BANK, nationalized Bank carrying on business of Banking all over India including from its Branch Office at 170, G. T. Road (South), P.O.- Shibpur, Howarh – 711102 for recovery ofRs. 15,16,730/- with interest withfurther interestfrom 01/08/2013 against the Defendants till payment and/or realization. The Defendants are the borrower/guarantor/mortgager.

Rina S.

2. The service of summons could not be effected upon the Defendants in usual mode of postal service. Hence, by the order of this Tribunal, the summons were served by substitute service by publishing in the newspapers in the ‘Statesman’ (in English) and in the ‘ The Statesman’(in Bengali) on 03/12/2016 published from Kolkata. Despite substituted service of summons and giving sufficient time, the Defendant neither appeared nor filed the Written Statement to controvert the claim of the Bank. Hence, the matter was declared exparte on 13/01/2026.

2. The Applicant in support of its contention filed Evidence on Affidavit duly affirmed by Mr. Bharat Chandra Tripathi,Chief Manager of the Bank annexing the various documents which are exhibited.

3. I have perused the documents and Evidence and heard the Ld. Advocate for the Bank. By the said evidence on affidavit the Applicant could prove its claim and documents. The claim of the Bank is within the limitation and within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. Hence, the claim of the Bank should be allowed with cost. In the above circumstances it is ordered :

O R D E R

i)

ii) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 15,16,730/- with simple interest @ 8% p.a. with monthly rest from 01/08/2013 against the Defendants till payment or realization. iii) It is declared that the claim is secured by hypothecation of moveable and mortgage of immoveable property described in the Schedule of immoveable property as described in the Schedule in the OA at page

14. iv) Let, a certificate be issued accordingly. v) Ld. Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law. vi) Ld. Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to deliver recovery certificate in term of the final order/judgment for recovery of the sum against the defendants in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions

Rina S. Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. vii) The parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer I on 09/03/2026 for further action in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, the Original Application being T.A. No.322of 2014 is allowed and stands disposed of. All the IAs, filed in connection with this OA, are also disposed of. Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website. File be consigned to the Record Room. (Dictated to P.S., transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the day 3rd February,2026) Place: Kolkata ( Ambuja Mohan Das ) Date3rd February,2026 Presiding Officer

Rina S. Page No.- Order Sheet (continuation) Case No. TA/322/2014 UCO Bank vs. Mr. Kumar Kanti Chakraborty&ors Date of the order Order with signature Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary 3rd February,2

Ld. Advocate Ms. Farida Yasmin appeared for theApplicant Bank. None is present on behalf of the Defendants. Matter was heard in open Court on 13/01/2026. The detailed order in three pages annexed separately. The gist of the order is as follows:

O R D E R

i) Claim of the Applicants is allowed with cost. ii) Claim of the Applicants is allowed with cost. iii) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 15,16,730/- with simple interest @ 9 % p.a. with monthly rest from 01/08/2013 against the Defendants till payment or realization. iv) It is declared that the claim is secured by hypothecation of moveable and mortgage of immoveable property described in the Schedule of immoveable property as described in the Schedule in the OA at page 14. v) Let, a certificate be issued accordingly. vi) Ld. Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law. vii) Ld. Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to deliver recovery certificate in term of the final order/judgment for recovery of the sum against the defendants in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. viii) The parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer I on 09/03/2026 for further action in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, the Original Application being T.A. No. 322 of 2014 is allowed and stands disposed of. All the IAs, filed in connection with this OA, are also disposed of. Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website. File be consigned to the Record Room. (Dictated to P.S., transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the day 3rd February,2026) Place: Kolkata (Ambuja Mohan Das)

Rina S. Date:3rd February,2026 Presiding Officer

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead