Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

SMT SAMPA BHARATI vs CANARA BANK on 14 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

Rina S. Order Sheet (continuation) Case No. NDN/193/2025 Arising out of OA/72/2019 SMT. SAMPA BHARATI VS. CANARA BANK Date of the Order Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary 14/05/202

Ld. Counsel Mr. Tapas Kumar Patra appeared for NDN Applicant. Ld. Counsel Mr. Surath Chakraborty appeared for Defendants. NDN Applicant has filed an application under section 22(2)(g) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy, Act 1993 for setting aside exparte judgment dated 05/02/2024 and Recovery Certificate dated 28/02/2024. NDN Applicant has filed another application being IA/633/2025 for condonation of delay of 99 days for filing application for setting aside exparte judgment. Limitation to file application for setting aside exparte judgment is 30 days. Judgment was delivered on 05/02/2024. Recovery Certificate issued on 28/02/2024 and application for recall of exparte judgment filed on 26/02/2025. Applicant has contended during the pendency of OA father-in-law of Applicant was suffering from cancer and died on 22.04.2018. Within a one-year defendant’s mother-in-law expired on 02.02.2024. After death of father-in-law and mother-in-law, DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

Rina S. Date of the Order Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary family of the Applicant was mentally disturbed. Thereafter, mother of Advocate had some health issue for which Applicant could not apply for certified copy. Applicant has annexed a discharge certificate which is not legible and discharge summary which speaks that the patient has some orthopedic problem and was advised for 10 days’ rest. The reasons assigned by the Applicant are not sufficient to explain the delay. Hence, delay condonation petition being IA/633/2025 is dismissed on contest. NDN/193/2025 arising out of OA/72/2019 is also dismissed. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead