Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

BANK OF INDIA vs EBADUL HAQUE MOLLA on 25 March 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Rina S.

BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I KOLKATA

PRESENT: -SHRI AMBUJA MOHAN DAS

PRESIDING OFFICER

T.A. 687 of 2013

(OA 631 of 2012)

DATE OF DELIVERY OF ORDER :25th March,2025

Bank of India, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 having its Head Office at“Star House”, C-5, “G” Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 and inter alia branch office, at Vill –

Marjada, P.O. – Hotar, P.S. Magrahat, District – 24 Parganas (South), also known as “Hotar Branch”.

..............APPLICANT

versus –

Md. Ebadul Haque Molla, carrying on business as the sole proprietor under the name and style of M.s/ Tripti Stores at Village – Alipore, P.O.

Suryapur Hat, P.s. Magrahat, District 24 Parganas (South), Pin Code No.

743372.

...........DEFENDANT

Counsel for the Applicant Bank:Ms. AninditaDas,Ld. Advocate Counsel for the Defendants: None appears.

Set ex-parte on 29.11.2024.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

J U D G M E N T

1. The present Recovery Application is filed by the Bank of India, nationalized Bank carrying on business of Banking all over India including from its Branch Office at Vill – Marjada, P.O. – Hotar, P.S. Magrahat, District – 24 Parganas (South), also known as “Hotar Branch”., for recovery ofRs.11,41,231.22p., with interest @ 14.25% with monthly rests from 01.05.2012against the Defendant till payment and/or realization. The Defendant is the borrower/guarantor/mortgager.

2. The service of summon could not be effected upon the Defendant in usual mode of postal service. Hence, by the order of this Tribunal, the summon was served by substitute service by publishing in the

Rina S. newspapers in the ‘Hindustan Times’ (in English) and in the ‘Bartaman’(in Bengali) on 8.1.2017 published from Kolkata. Despite substituted service of summons and giving sufficient time, the Defendant neither appeared nor filed the Written Statement to controvert the claim of the Bank. Hence, the matter was declared exparte on 29.11.2024.

3. The Applicant in support of its contention filed Evidence on Affidavit duly affirmed by Mr. Krishnabha Ray, officer Misc Servicesof the Bank,annexing the various documents which are exhibited.

4. I have perused the documents and Evidence and heard the Ld. Advocate for the Bank. By the said evidence on affidavit the Applicant could prove its claim and documents. The claim of the Bank is within the limitation and within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. Hence, the claim of the Bank should be allowed with cost. In the above circumstances it is ordered :

O R D E R

i) Claim of the Applicants is allowed with cost. ii) The Defendant is jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.11,41,231.22p., with interest @ 14.25% with monthly rests from 01.05.2012against the Defendants till payment or realization. iii) It is declared that the claim is secured by hypothecation of movables as described in the Schedule in the OA at page 19. iv) Let, a certificate be issued accordingly. v) Ld. Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law. vi) Ld. Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to deliver recovery certificate in term of the final order/judgment for recovery of the sum against the defendant in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

Rina S. vii) The parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer-II on 25/04/2025 for further action in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, the Transfer Application being T.A. No.687 of 2013 is allowed and stands disposed of. All the IAs, filed in connection with this OA, are also disposed of. Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website. File be consigned to the Record Room. (Dictated to P.S., transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the day 25th March,2025) Place: Kolkata s ( Ambuja Mohan Das ) Date:25th March,2025 Presiding Officer

Rina S. Page No.- Order Sheet (continuation) Case No. T.A. 687 of 2013 BANK OF INDIA –VS- EBADUL HAQUE MOLLA Date of the order Order with signature Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary 25th March,2025 Ld. Advocate Ms.Anindita Das, appeared for theApplicant Bank. None appeared on behalf of the Defendant. Matter was heard in open Court on 29.11.2024. The detailed order in three pages annexed separately. The gist of the order is as follows:

O R D E R

i) Claim of the Applicants is allowed with cost. ii) The Defendant is liable to pay Rs.11,41,231.22p., with interest @ 14.25% with monthly rests from 01.05.2012 till payment or realization. iii) It is declared that the claim is secured by hypothecation of movables as described in the Schedule in the OA at page 19. iv) Let, a certificate be issued accordingly. v) Ld. Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law. vi) Ld. Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to deliver recovery certificate in term of the final order/judgment for recovery of the sum against the defendant in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. vii) The parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer-II on 25/04/2025 for further action in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, the Transfer Application being T.A. No. 687 of 2013 is allowed and stands disposed of. All the IAs, filed in connection with this OA, are also disposed of. Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website. File be consigned to the Record Room. (Dictated to P.S., transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the day 25th March,2025) Place: Kolkata (Ambuja Mohan Das) Date:25th March,2025 Presiding Officer

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead