Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
UCO BANK vs RAJA ROY CHOWDHURY & ANR on 26 June 2025
Rina S.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I KOLKATA
PRESENT: -SHRI AMBUJA MOHAN DAS
PRESIDING OFFICER
O.A. No.TA/287/2014
DATE OF DELIVERY OF ORDER :26th June, 2025.
UCOBANK,A body corporate constituted under the meaning of Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and carries on its banking business from its several branches including the Shibpur Branch at 170, G. T. Road (South), Howrah, Pin - 711102.
.............APPLICANT
versus –
1. MR. RAJA ROY CHOWDHURY
Residing at 5/13 MohendraBagchi Road, 3rd Floor, P.O. & P.S. Bally, Howrah and also at 6/1/A Kumar Para Lane, Kolkata – 700035.
2. MRS. PUJA ROY CHOWDHURY
Residing at 6/1/A Kumar Para Lane, Kolkata – 700035.
...........DEFENDANTS
Counsel for the Applicant Bank:Mr. Md. Babulal Mollah and Ms. Farida Yasmin, Ld. Advocates.
Counsel for the Defendants: None appears.
Set ex-parte on 13/02/2025.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
1. The present Recovery Application is filed by the UCOBank, nationalized Bank carrying on business of Banking all over India including from its ShibpurBranch Office at 170, G. T. Road (South), Howrah, Pin - 711102, for recovery ofRs.11,35,085.25/- with interest as on31/03/2013 with interest @ 10.75% from 01/04/2013 against the Defendants till payment and/or realization. The Defendants are the borrower/guarantor/mortgager.
2. The service of summons could not be effected upon the Defendants in usual mode of postal service or hand service. Hence, by the order of
Rina S. this Tribunal, the summons were served by substitute service by publishing in the newspapers in the ‘The Statesmen’ (in English) and in the ‘Sangbad Pratidin’(in Bengali) on 23/07/2016 published from Kolkata. Despite substituted service of summons and giving sufficient time, the Defendant neither appeared nor filed the Written Statement to controvert the claim of the Bank. Hence, the matter was declared exparte on 13/02/2025.
3. The Applicant in support of its contention filed Evidence on Affidavit duly affirmed by Mr. Bharat Chandra Tripathy, Chief Managerof the Bank annexing the various documents which are exhibited.
4. I have perused the documents and Evidence and heard the Ld. Advocate for the Bank. By the said evidence on affidavit the Applicant could prove its claim and documents. The claim of the Bank is within the limitation and within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. Hence, the claim of the Bank should be allowed with cost. In the above circumstances it is ordered:
O R D E R
i) Claim of the Applicants is allowed with cost. ii) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 11,35,085.25/- with interest as on 31/03/2013 with interest @ 10.75% from 01/04/2013 against the Defendants till payment and/or realization. iii) It is declared that the claim is secured by hypothecation of moveable and mortgage of immoveable property described in the Schedule of immoveable property as described in the Schedule in the OA at page
12. iv) Let, a certificate be issued accordingly. v) Ld. Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law. vi) Ld. Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to deliver recovery certificate in term of the final order/judgment for recovery of the sum against the defendants in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. vii) The parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer-I on
Rina S. 29/07/2025 for further action in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, the Original Application being T.A. No.287 of 2014 is allowed and stands disposed of. All the IAs, filed in connection with this OA, are also disposed of. Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website. File be consigned to the Record Room. (Dictated to P.S., transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the day 26th June, 2025) Place: Kolkata ( Ambuja Mohan Das ) Date:26th June, 2025 Presiding Officer
Rina S. Page No.- Order Sheet (continuation) Case No. TA/287/2014 UCO BANK vs RAJA CHOWDHURY & ANR. Date of the order Order with signature Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary 26th June,
Ld. Advocates, Ms. Farida Yasmin appeared for theApplicant Bank. None appeared on behalf of the Defendants. Matter was heard in open Court on 13/02/2025. The detailed order in three pages annexed separately. The gist of the order is as follows:
O R D E R
i) Claim of the Applicants is allowed with cost. ii) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 11,35,085.25/- with interest as on 31/03/2013 with interest @ 10.75% from 01/04/2013 against the Defendants till payment and/or realization. iii) It is declared that the claim is secured by hypothecation of moveable and mortgage of immoveable property described in the Schedule of immoveable property as described in the Schedule in the OA at page 12. iv) Let, a certificate be issued accordingly. v) Ld. Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law. vi) Ld. Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to deliver recovery certificate in term of the final order/judgment for recovery of the sum against the defendants in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. vii) The parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer-I on 29/07/2025 for further action in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, the Original Application being T.A. No. 287 of 2014 is allowed and stands disposed of. All the IAs, filed in connection with this OA, are also disposed of. Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website. File be consigned to the Record Room. (Dictated to P.S., transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the day 26th June,
Place: Kolkata (Ambuja Mohan Das) Date:26th June, 2025 Presiding Officer
Rina S.