Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

UCO BANK vs RAJA ROY CHOWDHURY & ANR on 26 June 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Rina S.

BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I KOLKATA

PRESENT: -SHRI AMBUJA MOHAN DAS

PRESIDING OFFICER

O.A. No.TA/287/2014

DATE OF DELIVERY OF ORDER :26th June, 2025.

UCOBANK,A body corporate constituted under the meaning of Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and carries on its banking business from its several branches including the Shibpur Branch at 170, G. T. Road (South), Howrah, Pin - 711102.

.............APPLICANT

versus –

1. MR. RAJA ROY CHOWDHURY

Residing at 5/13 MohendraBagchi Road, 3rd Floor, P.O. & P.S. Bally, Howrah and also at 6/1/A Kumar Para Lane, Kolkata – 700035.

2. MRS. PUJA ROY CHOWDHURY

Residing at 6/1/A Kumar Para Lane, Kolkata – 700035.

...........DEFENDANTS

Counsel for the Applicant Bank:Mr. Md. Babulal Mollah and Ms. Farida Yasmin, Ld. Advocates.

Counsel for the Defendants: None appears.

Set ex-parte on 13/02/2025.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

J U D G M E N T

1. The present Recovery Application is filed by the UCOBank, nationalized Bank carrying on business of Banking all over India including from its ShibpurBranch Office at 170, G. T. Road (South), Howrah, Pin - 711102, for recovery ofRs.11,35,085.25/- with interest as on31/03/2013 with interest @ 10.75% from 01/04/2013 against the Defendants till payment and/or realization. The Defendants are the borrower/guarantor/mortgager.

2. The service of summons could not be effected upon the Defendants in usual mode of postal service or hand service. Hence, by the order of

Rina S. this Tribunal, the summons were served by substitute service by publishing in the newspapers in the ‘The Statesmen’ (in English) and in the ‘Sangbad Pratidin’(in Bengali) on 23/07/2016 published from Kolkata. Despite substituted service of summons and giving sufficient time, the Defendant neither appeared nor filed the Written Statement to controvert the claim of the Bank. Hence, the matter was declared exparte on 13/02/2025.

3. The Applicant in support of its contention filed Evidence on Affidavit duly affirmed by Mr. Bharat Chandra Tripathy, Chief Managerof the Bank annexing the various documents which are exhibited.

4. I have perused the documents and Evidence and heard the Ld. Advocate for the Bank. By the said evidence on affidavit the Applicant could prove its claim and documents. The claim of the Bank is within the limitation and within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. Hence, the claim of the Bank should be allowed with cost. In the above circumstances it is ordered:

O R D E R

i) Claim of the Applicants is allowed with cost. ii) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 11,35,085.25/- with interest as on 31/03/2013 with interest @ 10.75% from 01/04/2013 against the Defendants till payment and/or realization. iii) It is declared that the claim is secured by hypothecation of moveable and mortgage of immoveable property described in the Schedule of immoveable property as described in the Schedule in the OA at page

12. iv) Let, a certificate be issued accordingly. v) Ld. Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law. vi) Ld. Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to deliver recovery certificate in term of the final order/judgment for recovery of the sum against the defendants in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. vii) The parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer-I on

Rina S. 29/07/2025 for further action in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, the Original Application being T.A. No.287 of 2014 is allowed and stands disposed of. All the IAs, filed in connection with this OA, are also disposed of. Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website. File be consigned to the Record Room. (Dictated to P.S., transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the day 26th June, 2025) Place: Kolkata ( Ambuja Mohan Das ) Date:26th June, 2025 Presiding Officer

Rina S. Page No.- Order Sheet (continuation) Case No. TA/287/2014 UCO BANK vs RAJA CHOWDHURY & ANR. Date of the order Order with signature Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary 26th June,

Ld. Advocates, Ms. Farida Yasmin appeared for theApplicant Bank. None appeared on behalf of the Defendants. Matter was heard in open Court on 13/02/2025. The detailed order in three pages annexed separately. The gist of the order is as follows:

O R D E R

i) Claim of the Applicants is allowed with cost. ii) The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 11,35,085.25/- with interest as on 31/03/2013 with interest @ 10.75% from 01/04/2013 against the Defendants till payment and/or realization. iii) It is declared that the claim is secured by hypothecation of moveable and mortgage of immoveable property described in the Schedule of immoveable property as described in the Schedule in the OA at page 12. iv) Let, a certificate be issued accordingly. v) Ld. Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law. vi) Ld. Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to deliver recovery certificate in term of the final order/judgment for recovery of the sum against the defendants in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. vii) The parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer-I on 29/07/2025 for further action in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, the Original Application being T.A. No. 287 of 2014 is allowed and stands disposed of. All the IAs, filed in connection with this OA, are also disposed of. Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website. File be consigned to the Record Room. (Dictated to P.S., transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the day 26th June,

Place: Kolkata (Ambuja Mohan Das) Date:26th June, 2025 Presiding Officer

Rina S.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead