Allahabad High Court
A227/14121/2026 of HEAD CONSTABLE SUNIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14121 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to commanding
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14121 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the Claim Petition No. 739 of 2023 (Constable Sunil Kumar (112340878) Versus State of U.P. and others) dated 10.04.2023 filed by the petitioner before the respondent no. 2 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, pending before him."
2. It is contended that Claim Petition No.739 of 2023 is pending consideration before the U.P. State Public Service Tribunal, Lucknow. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expediting the said petition.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon U.P. State Public Service Tribunal, Lucknow to decide Claim Petition No.739 of 2023, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. October 7, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mirza Faheem Beg Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Head Constable Sunil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad