Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/10148/2026 of TARKESHWAR YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10148 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 10148 of 2026
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the present anticipatory application has become infructuous inasmuch as the applicant has been arrested, therefore, present application may be dismissed as not pressed.
3. In view of the above statement, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. October 7, 2026 Lalit Shukla Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suneel Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Tarkeshwar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad