Bombay High Court
APPLN/2793/2026 of SHAILESHBHAI GOVINDBHAI MAKWANA Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 16 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2793 OF 2026 IN APPLN/2335/2023 Shaileshbhai Govindbhai Makwana VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. S. A . Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for respondent-State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2793 OF 2026
IN APPLN/2335/2023
Shaileshbhai Govindbhai Makwana
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. S. A. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for respondent-State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE
: 16th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Counsel for applicant submits that in view of order dated 20.04.2026 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP Criminal No. 2260 of 2026, RCC No. 328 of 2021 pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tuljapur, Tq. Tuljapur, Dist. Osmanabad stood quashed. It is his submission that in view of the said judgment, the amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- deposited by the applicant pursuant to the order passed by Division Bench of this Court dated 19.08.2023.
2. Learned APP seeks appropriate order.
3. There is no dispute about the fact that by order dated 19.08.2023 passed in Criminal Application No. 2335 of 2023 seeking quashment of RCC No. 328 of 2021 above deposit is made. Since the 912-Cri Appln-2793-2026.odt
2026:BHC-AUG:49477-DB
Hon’ble Supreme Court has quashed said proceeding, there is no impediment in permitting withdrawal of the said amount with accrued interest to applicant.
4. Hence, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) B. S. Joshi 912-Cri Appln-2793-2026.odt