Bombay High Court
CA/2617/2026 of GAYABAI LAXMAN KALE SINCE DECEASED T/H LEGAL REPR. MOHARABAI KHOBRA KALE AND ORS. Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. on 15 October 2026
(933,934).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 932 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2617 OF 2026 IN FAST/5427/2026 GAYABAI LAXMAN KALE SINCE DECEASED T/H LEGAL REPR. MOHARABAI KHOBRA KALE AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
932 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2617 OF 2026
IN FAST/5427/2026
GAYABAI LAXMAN KALE SINCE DECEASED T/H LEGAL REPR.
MOHARABAI KHOBRA KALE AND ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST
COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.
AND
933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2632 OF 2026
IN FAST/5371/2026
BHAURAO S/O. DEVRAO WAGH.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST
COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.
AND
934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2633 OF 2026
IN FAST/5416/2026
EKNATH MOHAN KALE SINCE DECEASED THR LEGAL REPR.
MEERABAI AND ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST
COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Koralkar A. H.
AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Ms. Vaishali S. Chaudhary, Ms.
D. S. Jape, Ms. P. V. Diggikar, respectively.
Advocate for Respondent No.3 in CA/2633/2026 : Mr. V. H.
Solanke h/f Mr. Deshmukh Rajeev T.
...
CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 15.10.2026
PER COURT
:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Civil Applications have been filed by the claimants for condonation of delay in filing First Appeals.
2. There is delay of 3747, 4082 and 2750 days in filing the respective appeals. Notices have already been issued and respondent No.3 though served, none appears for him in first two matters. In Civil Application No.2633/2026, Respondent No.3 is served and learned counsel Mr. Deshmukh appears for acquiring body/Respondent No.3.
3. Learned AGP appears for respondents/State Authorities.
4. The reasons for delay in filing the appeals have been satisfactorily explained by the applicants in the respective applications. These being the statutory appeals, the delay deserve to be condoned and no prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the delay is condoned on the condition that, the claimants shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits
5. Civil Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” subject to condition that, the applicants shall furnish an undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that, they will not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period within a period of eight (8) weeks from today.
6. Civil Applications are disposed of accordingly. (MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.) ... vmk/-