Bombay High Court
WP/1134/2025 of GOKULDHAM GAUSHALA THROUGH SHRIKANT NANDLAL NAVANDAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 14 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1134 OF 2025 Gokuldham Gaushala ..PETITIONER VERSUS State of Maharashtra and Another ..RESPONDENTS .... Mr. D.J. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 – State Mr. Z.H. Farooqui, Advocate for respondent no.2 .... CORAM
932-CRWP-1134-25.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1134 OF 2025
Gokuldham Gaushala
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Maharashtra and Another
..RESPONDENTS
....
Mr. D.J. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 – State Mr. Z.H. Farooqui, Advocate for respondent no.2
....
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On 06th November, 2025, this Court has categorically held that the petitioner has not appeared and has also recorded earlier conduct of the petitioner of not appearing in the matter on the previous dates. In spite of the fact there were several chances given and also last chance granted by the said order, interim relief which was granted in favour of the petitioner was vacated. Even today, none appears for the petitioner.
2. Taking into consideration the previous order dated 06th November, 2025 and the previous absence of learned counsel for the petitioner, it transpires that the petitioner is not serious in prosecuting the present writ petition.
3. In light of above, criminal writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) SSD 1 / 1 2026:BHC-AUG:49378