Bombay High Court
CA/12046/2026 of SNEHAL VIJAY PATIL Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS on 13 October 2026
12046 / 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12046 OF 2026 IN WP/13379/2025 SNEHAL VIJAY PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for applicant : Mr. Dinesh B. Lingayat h/f. Mr. S.B.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 CA / 12046 / 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12046 OF 2026 IN WP/13379/2025 SNEHAL VIJAY PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for applicant : Mr. Dinesh B. Lingayat h/f. Mr. S.B. Ghatol Patil AGP for the respondent – State : Mr. N.S. Tekale Advocate for Respondent no. 4 : Mr. Anup R. Nikam ...
CORAM
: KISHORE C. SANT AND JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 13 OCTOBER 2026 PER COURT : CA/12046/2026 Heard learned advocate for the petitioner, learned AGP and learned advocate for respondent no. 4.
2. This Application is filed seeking restoration of writ petition no. 13379 of 2025 whereby the petition was dismissed in default in view of conditional order dated 03.07.2026 as the amendment was not carried out by the petitioner. There is delay of 52 days in filing the present Application. 2026:BHC-AUG:48938-DB
2 CA / 12046 / 2026
3. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay stands condoned. Application is allowed. Office to restore the writ petition to its original position. WP/13379/2025
4. Heard learned advocate for the respective parties. This Court has already decided group of writ petitions bearing no. 9430 of 2022 with connected writ petitions on 30.09.2026. Learned advocate for petitioner submits that in view of said judgment, the case of the petitioner is already covered.
5. In view of submission of the learned advocate, present writ petition stands disposed of as covered by the judgment passed by this Court in WP/9430/2022 pertaining to TET scam. [ JITENDRA JAIN ] [ KISHORE C. SANT ] JUDGE
JUDGE arp/