Bombay High Court
WP/10870/2017 of SANDHYA KISHOR MAHAJAN Vs DIPAK NAMDEO PATIL AND OTHERS on 13 October 2026
10870 / 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 WRIT PETITION NO. 10870 OF 2017 SANDHYA KISHOR MAHAJAN VERSUS DIPAK NAMDEO PATIL AND OTHERS ... None present for petitioner AGP for respondent – State : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar ... CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND JITENDRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 WP / 10870 / 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 WRIT PETITION NO. 10870 OF 2017 SANDHYA KISHOR MAHAJAN VERSUS DIPAK NAMDEO PATIL AND OTHERS ... None present for petitioner AGP for respondent – State : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar ...
CORAM
: KISHORE C. SANT AND JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 13 OCTOBER 2026 PER COURT : None present for the petitioner and for other respondents except the learned AGP.
2. Prayer (A) in the Petition reads as under :- “A] The Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of writ and thereby allow the Application dated 22.08.2017 filed by the present petitioner before the Government for seeking stay to the Judgment and Order dated 10.08.2017 passed by the learned Collector, Jalgaon in Disqualification Petition No. 3/2017.”
3. From the papers, it is seen that the petition was only for the purpose of considering the grant of interim stay to the judgment and order dated 10.08.2017 passed by the leraned Collector, Jalgaon in Disqualification Petition No. 3/2017. Now the main proceeding itself must have been decided. As it is, none has come forward for the 2026:BHC-AUG:48940-DB
2 WP / 10870 / 2017
petitioner to state the fact. Even the petitioner has lost his interest in prosecuting the writ petition.
4. Considering the above, petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. [ JITENDRA JAIN ] [ KISHORE C. SANT ] JUDGE
JUDGE arp/