Bombay High Court
WP/11576/2024 of KIRAN SAMBHAJI PATIL Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS on 13 October 2026
914 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 WRIT PETITION NO. 8033 OF 2026 VAISHALI SURESH PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS 911 WRIT PETITION NO. 781 OF 2023 SANDIP GURULING SHETE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 909 - 914 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 WRIT PETITION NO. 8033 OF 2026 VAISHALI SURESH PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS 911 WRIT PETITION NO. 781 OF 2023 SANDIP GURULING SHETE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS 912 WRIT PETITION NO. 14210 OF 2023 CHANDRASING RAMA VALVI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS 913 WRIT PETITION NO. 3835 OF 2024 PRASHANT MADHUKAR PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS 914 WRIT PETITION NO. 11576 OF 2024 KIRAN SAMBHAJI PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for petitioner : Mr. Ajay D. Pawar (909, 913 and 914) Advocate for petitioner : Mr. Yash A. Jadhav h/f. Mr. S.R. Sapkal (911) Advocate for petitioner : Mr. R.I. Wakade (912) AGP for the respondent – State : Mr. K.N. Lokhande, Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya Mr. P.S. Patil, Addl.G.P., Mr. R.S. Wani Advocate for MSCE, Pune : Mr. Anup R. Nikam ...
CORAM
: KISHORE C. SANT AND JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 13 OCTOBER 2026 2026:BHC-AUG:48937-DB
2 909 - 914 PER COURT : These petitions are arising out of the scam realting to TET examinations held in the year 2018 / 2019.
2. Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that in fact, cases of the petitioners are squarely covered by the common judgment and order dated 30.09.2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 9430 of 2022 along with other companion matters.
3. Considering the above, present petitions stand disposed of in terms of the said judgment and order passed in Writ Petition No. 9430 of 2022 along with the companion Writ Petitions.
4. There shall be protection in these Petitions in view of the interim orders, for a period of eight (8) weeks from today. [ JITENDRA JAIN ] [ KISHORE C. SANT ] JUDGE
JUDGE arp/