Bombay High Court
BA/1872/2026 of UMESH BHAI MAGANBHAI HARIJAN @ UMESD BHAI @ UMESH HARIJAN Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR on 19 October 2026
(P.A.) ININ THETHE HIGHHIGH COURTCOURT OFOF JUDICATUREJUDICATURE ATAT BOMBAYBOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1872 OF 2026 Umesh Bhai Maganbhai Harijan @ Umesd Bhai @ Umesh Harijan .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..
51.BA.1872.2026.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT
(P.A.)
IN
IN THE
THE HIGH
HIGH COURT
COURT OF
OF JUDICATURE
JUDICATURE AT
AT BOMBAY
BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1872 OF 2026
Umesh Bhai Maganbhai Harijan @
Umesd Bhai @ Umesh Harijan
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
.. Respondents
....................
Ms. Sana Shaikh a/w. Ms. Sharadha Gaikwad, Advocates for Applicant.
Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for Respondent No.1.
PSI – H. V. Waghmare, Khopoli Police Station, Raigad.
...................
CORAM
: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE
: OCTOBER 19, 2026
P.C.
:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. Shaikh, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Talhar, learned APP for Respondent No.1.
2. Ms. Shaikh and Ms. Talhar has argued the Bail Application fully.
3. Considering the paucity of time, I am not in position to deliver full verdict with reasons.
4. Bail Application is dismissed. Reasons to follow and order with reasons shall be uploaded within a period of 15 days from today.
5. Bail Application is dismissed and disposed. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 1 of 1