Bombay High Court

BA/3923/2026 of VISHAL SADASHIV KHILLARE Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 19 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGHHIGH COURTCOURT OFOF JUDICATUREJUDICATURE ATAT BOMBAYBOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.3923 OF 2026 Vishal Sadashiv Khillare .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................  Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a /w

Sharada

IN

IN THE

THE HIGH

HIGH COURT

COURT OF

OF JUDICATURE

JUDICATURE AT

AT BOMBAY

BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

BAIL APPLICATION NO.3923 OF 2026

Vishal Sadashiv Khillare

.. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

.. Respondent

....................

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w Mr. Yash Fadtare, Advocates for Applicant.

Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for Respondent-State.

...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE

: OCTOBER 19, 2026

P.C.

:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Joshi, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Newton, learned APP for Respondent-State.

2. This is an Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking bail in connection with C.R. No.495 of 2024 registered with Walchandnagar Police Station, Pune for offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238, 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The Applicant is a young offender. According to the prosecution, the case against the Applicant is based on circumstantial evidence i.e the theory last seen together, as Applicant was allegedly seen in the company of the co-accused persons in the village prior to the incident in question. The victim was allegedly assaulted and murdered with an unknown weapon, and his burnt body was discovered by a villager who thereafter informed the police.

4. At this stage, the only other incriminating material relied upon by the prosecution against the Applicant is the alleged extra- judicial confession of the Applicant to indict him.

5. The Applicant has been in custody for approximately two years and one month, and the trial has not commenced. Considering the aforesaid prima facie material and the period of incarceration suffered by the Applicant, I am inclined to consider the Applicant's case favourably for grant of bail.

6. Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the following terms and conditions:-

(i) Applicant is directed to be immediately released from prison in connection with CR. No.495 of 2024;

(ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like amount;

(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at concerned Police Station, once every month, on the first

Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. until commencement of trial and thereafter shall attend all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;

(iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates, unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;

(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra without prior permission of the Trial Court;

(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or tamper with the evidence in any manner;

(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed of his current residential address and mobile telephone number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating Officer of any change in his residential address or mobile telephone number, as and when such change occurs; and

(viii) Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to the Applicant.

7. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made hereinabove in this order.

8. Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead