Bombay High Court
WP/13616/2026 of MAHESH CHANDRASHEKHAR RATKALKAR Vs CHANDRAKANT SITARAM CHATORKAR AND ORS on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13616 OF 2026 MAHESH CHANDRASHEKHAR RATKALKAR ...PETITIONER Versus CHANDRAKANT SITARAM CHATORKAR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Mr. Sagar M. Kursija, learned counsel for the Petitioner. None for the
Gitalaxmi
11-WP-13616-2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13616 OF 2026
MAHESH CHANDRASHEKHAR RATKALKAR
...PETITIONER
Versus
CHANDRAKANT SITARAM CHATORKAR
AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Sagar M. Kursija, learned counsel for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM
: ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE
: 16th OCTOBER, 2026.
Per Court :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Learned counsel after arguing for some time has submitted that the only issue, that would require to be pressed relates to Issue No. D (page 33 of the paper-book). The same is noted below for reference :- “Whether the suit is accurately and correctly valued in view of declaration of standard rent of Rs. 150/-, as declared in the earlier Civil Suit bearing No. 221/2008 filed by the Plaintiff ?”
16th OCTOBER, 2026
Gitalaxmi 11-WP-13616-2026.docx
2. Learned counsel submits that the Plaintiff has valued the suit considering the rent @ of Rs. 350/- per month.
3. It appears that there is no issue of the valuation in the present matter. Even if the rent is reduced, the matter would be maintainable before the same learned Trial Court, as such the issue of the valuation does not arise and therefore, learned Trial Court has correctly dismissed the application.
4. In view of the above, no case is made out to interfere with. Hence the present Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ]
16th OCTOBER, 2026