Bombay High Court
WP/5088/2026 of SURENDRA SINGH S/O JAGAN SINGH Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR on 16 October 2026
CRIWP 5088-26+.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5088 OF 2026 Surendra Singh S/o Jagan Singh … Petitioner V/S. State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents AND CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5089 OF 2026 Satyendra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5088 OF 2026
Surendra Singh S/o Jagan Singh
… Petitioner
V/S.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
… Respondents
AND
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5089 OF 2026
Satyendra Kumar S/o Surendra Singh
… Petitioners
V/S.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
… Respondents
AND
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5090 OF 2026
Shishupal Singh S/o Surendra Singh
… Petitioner
V/S.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
… Respondents
AND
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5091 OF 2026
Mrs. Gomati W/o Surendra Singh and Anr.
… Petitioners
V/S.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
… Respondents
Mr. Karma Vivan a/w. Tarak Shah, Abhay Singh and Om Vare, for the Petitioners in all petitions.
Mr. V.A. Kulkarni, APP for Resp.No.1 in WP/5088 and 2089/26.
Mr.Vinod Chate, APP for Resp.No.1 in WP/5090/26.
Mr. R. M. Pethe (through VC), APP for Resp.No.1 in WP/5091/26.
Mr.Vinayak Gurav, PSI, Kalepadal PS, present.
CORAM:
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED :
16th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The aforesaid petitions have arisen out of the same FIR. Writ Petition Nos. 5088 of 2026, 5089 of 2026 and 5091 of 2026 have been filed by the relatives of the petitioner No.1 in Writ Petition No. 5090 of 2026, who is the husband of Respondent No.2 in the aforesaid petitions. Since individual allegations have been made against the petitioners in Writ Petition Nos.5088 of 2026, 5089 of 2026 and 5091 of 2026, they have preferred separate petitions.
2. Therefore, Mr. Vivan, learned Advocate for the petitioners requested for leave to amend in Writ Petition No.5091 of 2026 to put forth therein the case of petitioners in Writ Petition Nos.5088 of 2026 and 5089 of 2026 together and, if required, to modify the prayer clause, accordingly. Further, Mr. Vivan submitted that as per the instructions received by him, charge-sheet in the said FIR has been filed, therefore, additional leave may be granted to enclose the charge- sheet and to modify the prayer clause, accordingly.
3. Said requests made by Mr. Vivan appear reasonable. Hence, leave to amend is granted.
4. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.
5. As the amendment would serve the purpose of filing Writ Petition Nos.5088 of 2026 and 5089 of 2026, Mr. Vivan, the learned counsel, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the said petitions, without prejudice.
6. Leave to withdraw is granted.
7. Writ Petition Nos.5088 of 2026 and 5089 of 2026 stand disposed of as withdrawn, without prejudice.
8. After carrying out the amendment, issue notice to the Respondents in Writ Petition Nos.5090 of 2026 and 5091 of 2026, returnable on 20th November, 2026.
9. Mr. Chate, and Mr. Pethe, the learned APPs, waives notice on behalf of Respondent No.1-State in the respective petitions.
10. Learned counsel for the petitioners to provide copies of the petitions to the Registry within a period of two weeks from today.
11. Stand over to 20th November, 2026. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)