Bombay High Court
APL/977/2023 of DIGAMBAR CHANDRASHA KOLI Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND AN on 14 October 2026
(P.A.) ININ THETHE HIGHHIGH COURTCOURT OFOF JUDICATUREJUDICATURE ATAT BOMBAYBOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.977 OF 2023 Digambar Chandrasha Koli .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
P1.APL.977.2023.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT
(P.A.)
IN
IN THE
THE HIGH
HIGH COURT
COURT OF
OF JUDICATURE
JUDICATURE AT
AT BOMBAY
BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.977 OF 2023
Digambar Chandrasha Koli
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
.. Respondents
....................
Ms. Martina Sapkal a/w. Ms. Anjali Dhange, Advocates i/by Arun &
Sapkal & Co. for Respondent No.2.
...................
CORAM
: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE
: OCTOBER 19, 2026
P.C.
:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Not on Board. Mentioned by way of filing praecipe dated 16.10.2026. Perused the praecipe filed for Speaking to the Minutes of order dated 14.10.2026
2. Heard Ms. Sapkal, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.
3. In the order dated 14.10.2026, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 seeks addition of her appearance in the appearance clause. Hence, ‘Ms. Martina Sapkal a/w. Ms. Anjali Dhange, Advocates i/by Arun & Sapkal & Co. for Respondent No.2’ be recorded.
4. Necessary correction be carried out in the original order and fresh copy be uploaded.
5. Praecipe is disposed. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 1 of 1