Bombay High Court
IA/3558/2024 of pr commissioner of income tax 2 Vs LARSEN AND TOUBRO INFOTECH LTD on 16 October 2026
Prajakta Vartak IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
306-IA 3558-24.DOC
Prajakta Vartak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3558 OF 2024
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO. 22939 OF 2024
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2
...Applicant
Vs
Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.
...Respondent
_________
Mr. Nirmal Mohanty for Applicant/Appellant.
Ms. Aasavari Kadam for Respondent.
__________
CORAM:
G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE:
16 OCTOBER 2026
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By this Interim Application, the Applicant / Appellant has prayed for condonation of 25 days in filing the aforesaid Appeal.
2. We have heard Mr. Mohanty, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Ms. Kadam, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. We have perused the averments made in the Interim Application. For the reasons stated in the Interim Application, the Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
4. Interim Application is disposed of. No costs.
5. Let the office objections, if any, be removed within a period of eight weeks from today. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
16 October 2026