Bombay High Court
IA/4991/2026 of Unispeed Pharmaceutical Pvt Ltd Vs Fibovil Pharmaceutical enterprises Pvt Ltd on 15 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 33681 OF 2026
IN
COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 114 OF 2026
Fibovil Pharmaceutical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.… Applicant (Defendant No.1)
In the matter between
Sun Pharma Industries Ltd. & Anr.
...Plaintiffs
V/s.
Fibovil Pharmaceutical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 28961 OF 2026
IN
COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 114 OF 2026
Unispeed Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.
… Applicant
(Defendant No.7)
In the matter between
Sun Pharma Industries Ltd. & Anr.
...Plaintiffs
V/s.
Fibovil Pharmaceutical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 29762 OF 2026
IN
COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 114 OF 2026
MMG Healthcare
… Applicant
(Defendant No.10)
In the matter between
Sun Pharma Industries Ltd. & Anr.
...Plaintiffs
V/s.
Fibovil Pharmaceutical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants ______________________
Mr. Rahul R. Dubey a/w Ms. Shradha Patil, Ms. Ayesha i/by Atmaram Patade for the Applicants and for Defendant Nos.1, 7 and
10.
Mr. Hiren Kamod a/w Mr. Nishad Nandkarni, Mr. Aasif Navodia, Ms. Khushboo Jhunjhunwala, Ms. Maitri Asher, Ms. Rohan Lopez, Ms. Rakshita Singh and Ms. Nihala Naiyyira i/by Khaitan & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Sahil D. Salvi for Defendant Nos.2 & 9.
Mr. Vikas Mishra for Defendant No.4.
Mr. Deepak Bhalerao, 2nd Asstt. to Court Receiver present.
______________________
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 15 OCTOBER 2026
P. C. :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. These Interim Applications have been filed respectively by Defendant Nos.1, Defendant No.7 and Defendant No.10 seeking
PPN
15. IAL-33681.26 & ORS.DOC condonation of delay in filing the written statement.
2. As far as Defendant No.1 is concerned, there is delay of 103 days in filing the written statement, as far as Defendant No.7 is concerned, there is delay of 31 days in filing the written statement and as far as Defendant No.10 is concerned, there is delay of 31 days in filing the written statement.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff strongly opposes the said Interim Applications.
4. However, adequate reasons are set out in the respective Interim Applications seeking condonation of delay. Accordingly, the delay in filing the written statements by Defendant No.1, Defendant No.7 and Defendant No.10 is condoned for the reasons set out in the said Interim Applications. The written statements respectively filed by the Defendant Nos.1, 7 and 10 are directed to be taken on record.
5. All the three Interim Applications are accordingly disposed of in above terms. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
PPN