Bombay High Court

WP/836/2026 of SHARIK PARVEZ IQBAL AHMED Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AND OTHERS. on 16 October 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH

3 wp836.26.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.836/2026

Sharik s/o Parvez Iqbal Ahmed vs. The Superintendent of Police, SP Office, Chandrapur and ors Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri C.R.Khobragade, Counsel for the Petitioner.

Mrs.H.N.Jaipurkar, APP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.

CORAM :

URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE &

RAJ D.WAKODE, JJ.

DATED : 16th October , 2026.

1. Heard.

2. The petitioner, who is owner of survey N0.120, situated at mauza Panzurni, taluka Warora, district Chandrapur, has approached this court seeking directions to respondent No.1 – The Superintendent of Police, Chandrapur and respondent No.2 – The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Warora, district Chandrapur.

3. The contention is that respondent No.3 – Chandrakant Wasade has been conducting illegal excavation and construction on the aforesaid land, which was originally owned by grandfather of the petitioner. Upon such illegal activities conducted by respondent No.3, the petitioner has approached respondent No.1 by submitting complaint dated 3.8.2026. A copy of the aforesaid complaint is on record at page No.52 (Annexure-K).

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even after passage of more than two months now, respondent No.1 has not decided the aforesaid complaint and, therefore, the petitioner has approached this court.

Page 1 of 2

3 wp836.26.odt

5. In view of the above, we dispose of the present writ petition with directions to respondent No.2 to look into the aforesaid complaint dated 3.8.2026 submitted by the petitioner and take aforesaid complaint to its logical end.

6. Respondent No.1 shall grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner so also to respondent No.3 before deciding the aforesaid complaint and shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law.

7. The decision taken thereupon shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of such decision.

8. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. [RAJ D.WAKODE, J.]

[URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.]

!! BrWankhede !! Signed by: Mr. B. R. Wankhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 19/10/2026 10:26:26

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead