Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
Ashif Ahmed Mallick vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 8 March 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.
KOLKATA DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL NO. 2
ORDER SHEET
(Continuation)
Case No. \_\_\_\_\_
Vs \_\_\_\_\_
<table border="1" style="width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;"> <thead> <tr> <th style="width: 10%; text-align: center;">Date<br/>of<br/>Order</th> <th style="width: 70%; text-align: center;">Order with Signature</th> <th style="width: 20%; text-align: center;">Office action with<br/>date and dated<br/>Signature of<br/>parties when<br/>necessary</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td></td> <td> <p>M.A./10/2012<br/>(arising out of S.A./109/2010)</p> <p>Ashif Ahmed Mallick & Another Vs State Bank of India & Others</p> <p>Date : 08.03.2019</p> <p>Present :</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">None is appearing for Misc. Applicant.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Ms. Farida Yasmin, Learned Counsel appears for Respondent Bank.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Matter is of 2012.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">It appears that the Misc. Applicant is not interested to pursue the matter.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Accordingly, Misc. Application, being M.A. No. 10 of 2012 is dismissed for non-prosecution</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">File be consigned to Record Room</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Order be uploaded in the Tribunal's Website.</p> <div style="text-align: right; margin-top: 20px;"> <br/> (M.S. Rao)<br/> Presiding Officer<br/> Kolkata DRT No. 2 </div> </td> <td></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
8-03-2019