Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
MD Sagir Ahmed vs CANARA BANK on 12 March 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.
KOLKATA DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL NO. 2
ORDER SHEET
(Continuation)
Case No. \_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_ Vs \_\_\_\_\_
<table border="1"> <thead> <tr> <th style="text-align: center;">Date<br/>of<br/>Order</th> <th style="text-align: center;">Order with Signature</th> <th style="text-align: center;">Office action with<br/>date and dated<br/>Signature of<br/>parties when<br/>necessary</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td></td> <td> <p>Order No. Dated 12.3.2019<br/>M.A. 74 of 2011<br/>(Arising out of S.A. 305 of 2009)<br/>Md. Sagir Ahmed -vs- Canara Bank</p> <p>Present:</p> <p>None for Misc. Applicant</p> <p>Record reveals that the matter is pending since 2011. No Service Report has been filed by the Applicant till date.</p> <p>It is seen from the records that the Applicant has filed the present M.A., being M.A. 74 of 2011, on 7<sup>th</sup> September, 2011, praying for recalling of the order dated 9<sup>th</sup> August, 2011 and restoration of the S.A. 305 2009 to its original file and number.</p> <p>2. Before going into the merits of the case, conduct of the Applicant, after filing of the M.A., deserves to be scrutinised.</p> <p>(i) Applicant, after filing of the M.A. on 7<sup>th</sup> September, 2011, has not made any effective persuasion of the case. Till date Applicant has not filed the service report confirming service of the copy of the M.A. upon the Respondent Bank. Applicant has not taken any effective step for expeditious disposal of the matter. The matter is taken up for hearing today, on 12<sup>th</sup> March, 2019 when no one appeared on behalf of the Applicant.</p> <p style="text-align: right;"><i>U. J. S. Ch</i></p> </td> <td></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
Page No.
KOLKATA DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL NO. 2
ORDER SHEET
(Continuation)
Case No. \_\_\_\_\_
Vs \_\_\_\_\_
<table border="1"> <thead> <tr> <th data-bbox="105 226 178 288">Date of Order</th> <th data-bbox="183 226 763 288">Order with Signature</th> <th data-bbox="768 226 893 288">Office action with date and dated Signature of parties when necessary</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td data-bbox="105 293 178 922"></td> <td data-bbox="183 293 763 922"> <p>(ii) From the conduct of the Applicant it is evident that Applicant is not serious and diligent in pursuing the M.A. It is bounden duty of the Applicant to proceed with the application for the relief sought against the order passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal. From the conduct of the Applicant it appears that the Applicant is not interested to pursue the M.A. for disposal but has filed the present M.A. only to drag the case without taking any effective steps.</p> <p>(iii) Under the circumstances, as none appears on behalf of the Applicant, the Misc. Application deserves to be dismissed for non-prosecution.</p> <p>3. Accordingly, the present M.A., being M.A. 74 of 2011, is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Copy of the Order be uploaded in the Tribunal's Website.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">File be consigned to the Record Room.</p> <p style="text-align: right;"> <br/> (M. S. RAO) 12-03-2019<br/> Presiding Officer<br/> DRT-2, Kolkata </p> <p>29/ac</p> </td> <td data-bbox="768 293 893 922"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>