Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
Sri Ranjan Sarkar vs Sri Ranjan Sarkar on 17 June 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.
KOLKATA DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL NO. 2
ORDER SHEET
(Continuation)
Case No. \_\_\_\_\_
Vs \_\_\_\_\_
<table border="1" style="width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;"> <thead> <tr> <th style="width: 10%; text-align: center;">Date<br/>of<br/>Order</th> <th style="width: 60%; text-align: center;">Order with Signature</th> <th style="width: 30%; text-align: center;">Office action with<br/>date and dated<br/>Signature of<br/>parties when<br/>necessary</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td></td> <td> <p><b>RA/02/2015</b></p> <p><b>Central Bank of India Vs Sri Ranjan Sarkar & Another</b></p> <p>Date : 17.06.2019</p> <p>Present :</p> <p>None is appearing for Review Applicant.</p> <p>None is appearing for the Respondents.</p> <p>No Affidavit-in-Opposition has been filed by Respondents.</p> <p>Record reveals that matter is pending since 2015.</p> <p>It appears that Review Applicant is not interested to pursue the case.</p> <p>As none appears on behalf of the Review Applicant, the Review Application does not deserve any scrutiny/examination and deserves to be dismissed for non-prosecution.</p> <p>Accordingly, the present Review Application being R.A. No. 02 of 2015 is dismissed for non-prosecution.</p> <p>File be consigned to record room.</p> <p>Order be uploaded in the Tribunal's Website.</p> <div style="text-align: right; margin-top: 20px;"> <br/> (M.S. Rao)<br/> Presiding Officer<br/> Kolkata DRT No. 2 </div> </td> <td></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>