Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
Pritamber Jha vs UCO BANK on 3 September 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.**KOLKATA DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL NO. 2****ORDER SHEET****(Continuation)**
Case No. \_\_\_\_\_
Vs \_\_\_\_\_
<table border="1"> <thead> <tr> <th data-bbox="52 177 140 256">Date of Order</th> <th data-bbox="140 177 830 256">Order with Signature</th> <th data-bbox="830 177 982 256">Office action with date and dated Signature of parties when necessary</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td data-bbox="52 256 140 855"></td> <td data-bbox="140 256 830 855"> <p>Order No. 05 Dated 03.9.2019</p> <p>Appeal No. 04 of 2018</p> <p>(Arising out of RC 27 of 2012)</p> <p>Pritamber Jha -vs- UCO Bank</p> <p>Present:</p> <p>None for Appellant</p> <p>None for Defendant Bank</p> <p>In spite of order dated 26<sup>th</sup> June, 2019, no proper service is effected nor affidavit-of-service is filed. Today also none appears to represent the Appellant.</p> <p>From the conduct of the Appellant it appears that the Appellant is not interested to pursue the appeal.</p> <p>Accordingly, as none appears on behalf of the Appellant, the Appeal deserves to be dismissed for non-prosecution.</p> <p>Accordingly, the present Appeal being Appeal No. 04 of 2018, is dismissed for non-prosecution.</p> <p>Copy of the Order be uploaded in the Tribunal's Website.</p> <p>File be consigned to the Record Room.</p> </td> <td data-bbox="830 256 982 855"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
28/ac
Sd/- (M.S. Rao) Presiding Officer DRT-2, Kolkata