Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
CANARA BANK (SYNDICATE BANK) vs PROLAY SINHA ROY on 17 February 2026
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL.III KOLKATA
PRESENT:. SRI ARBIND MADHAV
PRESIDING OFFICER OF DRT-II KOLKATA
ADOITIONAL CHARGE OF DRT-III KOLXATA
T.A. NO. 974 0F 2014.
DATE OF DELMRY OF ORDER I t7 /02/2026
1.
Canara Bank is a body Corporate constituted under the Banking Compantes (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakangs) Act, 1970, having its Head Office at 112, layachamarajendra Road, Bangalore-560002, Karnataka, inter alia, carrying on its business from its'Bells House', 21, Camac Street, 5th Floor, Kolkata-700016, P.S.- Shakespeare Sarani, within the jurisdiction of thas Ld. Tribunal.
Applicant Bank.
-Versus-
I'lr. Prolay Slnha Roy, Son of Aurobinda Sinha Roy of 5/1, Gobinda Roy Lane, Kallghat, Kolkata-700026 and also at 133, G. T. Road (North), Howrah-711105.
Mr. !'lilan Maity, Son of Ananda l.4aity of Dasnagar, Shanpur (North), Nathpara (west), Jagacha, Howrah-711105 and also at 3D, Barungachi, Salkia, Jagacha, Howrah-711105.
Defendants.
Counsel for the Applicant Bankr -
2.
Tutul Das Singh, Ld. Counsel
set ex-parte on
1010212026
2.
1.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGEMENT
The Applicant Bank filed the present TA being No. TAl974l2014 on l4/O2l2,ll (arising out of O.A. No. 226 of 2olt filed before DRT-2, Kolkata) for recovery of a total sum of Rs. 23,32,039,2a/- (Rupees twenty three lakh thirty two thousand thirty nine and paisa twenty elght only) from the Defendants towards OSL facility together with interest, cost and other usual reliefs. The Defendants are served with summons. The defendants did not appear, as there was no representation from the defendants, the case was fixed for ex-parte hearing on 10/02/2026, and heard ex-parte accordinglY. The Appllcant Bank examined 11 documents through Sri Murali Dhar Behera, Principal Omcer marked as Exhibit Annexure-A to Exhibit Annexure'K.
3. / i. Annexure A- Application for Loan
7.
6. 4,
ii. Annexure B- Sanction Letter
iii. Annexure C- General Agreement
iv. Annexure O- Acknowledgement Receipt v. Annexure E- Guarantee Agreement
vi. Annexure F- Letter handed over Title Deed
vii. Annexure G- Confirmation deposit of'Ilfle Deed
viii. Annexure H- Title Deed
ix. Annexure I- Demand Notice
x. Annexure J- Acknowledgement of Debt
xi. Annexure K- Statements of Accounts Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank. The polnt that arlses for consideration is : Whether the Appllcant Bank ts entifled to the claim made in the OA against the Defendants and OA schedule properues as prayed for? As stated supra, the Defendant remained absent and did not turn up to controvert the verslon of the O.A. of Appllcant Bank, The Evtdence Amdavit coupled with the recitals in the documents viz., Exhibits Annexure-A to Annexure-K marked on behalf of the Applicant Bank, establlshed the clalm of the Applicant Bank agaihst the Defendants and OA schedule propertles. Hence, I hold that the Defendants are jotntly and severally liable to pay to the Applicant Bank the clatms made ln the OA with future lnterest and costs. In the result, the p.esent Original Application is allowed ex-parte wtth costs, as under:_
ORDER
(1) T.A. No. 974 ot 2014 f ed by the Applicant Bank is alowed and debt is determrned with cost against the defendants. It is hereby ordered that appricant bank is entitled to recover from the defendants the total amount to the tune of Rs. 23,32,039.28l- (Rupees t\^/enty three lakh thirty two thousand thirty nlne and paisa twenty eight only) with pendentetite and future lnterest @ ,.40lo per annum interest with simple on the amount due from the date of flling of the orrgrnar Applicaflon r,e L4/o2/2olr tilr fu and finar realization of the craim amount.
(2) Amount, if any, paid by the defendants in the roan accounts or amount, if any, recovered by the Applicant Bank after f ing of the o.A, the same be taken into account whire arriving at the exact amount of dues/debt payable by the defendants. Accordingly, pendentelite and future interest shall be calculated on the reduced amount.
(3) Defendants are debarred from disposing, alienating or deallng with any of the properties belonging to them Ull the aforesatd decretal debt is recovered from the defendants.
(4) Defendants are given a time of thirty days from the date of the .repaying of the above mentioned dues, so intimated to them. to pay the dues wlthin the above mentioned time, the applicant Judgement/Final Order for In case the defendants fail bank is entitled to recover its dues by sale of secured assets, if any. Applicant bank is also entifled to proceed against personal properties of the defendants (Both movable and immovable) and also proceed agalnst the defendants personally to recover the dues in accordance with law.
(5) Let the Certificate of Recovery be drawn up by Ld. Regtstrar forthwith in terms of Judgement for issuance of the same against defendants in favour of the applicant bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 and put up the same for issuance of the Certificate.
(6) Ld, Recovery Officer shall realize the amount as per the Recovery Certificate from the defendants in accordance with law.
(7) Ld, Registrar of this Tribunal is directed to detiver recovery certificate in term of the ftnal order/judgement for recovery of the sum against the defendant in favour of the Applicant Bank under Section 19 (22) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 now known as Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.
(8) The parties are dlrected to appear before the Recovery Otfice. on 17/03/2026 for further actlon in accordance with law in the event the entire amount is not paid by the said date. Accordingly, T.A. No. 974 of 2014 (arising out of O.A. No. 226 of 2011 filed before DRT-2, Kolkata) is allowed and stands disposed of. Copy of the JudgemenVFinal Order be uploaded in the Tribunat,s website. File ls consigned to the Record Room. (Dictat€d to steno, transcrlbed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by m€ in the open court on the tTrh day ofFebruary,2026) I t d !, .t,..-.---,*u,,',--ril;-r^F PRESIDING OFFICER OF DRT-II KOLKATA ADDITIONAL CHARGE OF DRT.III KOLKATA
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation) case lo, ta tro, gia oiEra Order No.23 ot.17 t 02t2026 Order pronounced (vide separate sheets). In the resutt, T.A. No. 974 of 2Ot4 (arising out of O.A. 2011 filed before DRT_2, Kotkata) is altowed with costs. Issue Recovery Certjficate accordinqly.