STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SRI SANDIP DE on 6 March 2026

Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation) Case No. TA 1005 of 2015 Statc Bank of Indla vs. Srl Sandlp De D.te ol Order Order wlth slgnature slgn.tur€ ot order No.22 pt.06.03.2026 Sl.No.21 SH Pl€3ant ! For Appllcant Ld. Counsel Md. Amjad Ali For Defendant : None I4y'449l2026 ls taken up for hearing. lleard Ld. counsel appearing for Applicant Bank. Consldered. None appears from the side of the Defendant. Ld counsel for the Appllcant flled I.A. No. 449 of 2025 ln vlew ot the fact that the O.A whlch was filed seeklng recovery of Rs.13,46,914.70l- ls settled and has prayed for wlthdrarryal of the present T,A. The appllcatlon ls supported by aftidavlt of Mr. SatyaJlt Chowdhury, Chlef Manager of the appllcant Bank. Durlng the pendency of the T.A. the defendant has compromised and settled the matter and the Appllcant Bank has lssued the 'No Objectlon Certlflcate' and made prayer to dlspose of the matter fgr non-prosecutlon. Slnce thls ls an amicable settlement between the partles and the Appllcant lntends to wlthdraw the maln T.A., no prejudlce wlll be caused lf the I.A. ls allowed wlthout lnvlting response from other slde. Accordingly, the lnstant I.A. ls allowed and stands dlsposed of being dlsmlssed as wlthdrdwn as settled amlcably. T.A. No.1005 of 2015 along with all pendlng I.A.s, if any, ls dlsposed as wlthdrawn belng settled amlcably, Flle be conslgned to Record Room after observing all formalltles. \. Arblnd Madhav Presldlng Offlcer DRT-2, Kolkata Addltlonal Charge of DRT-3, Kolkata I