Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

Smt Meera vs M/s Shubham Housing Development Finance Company Limited on 21 October 2026

DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DEL.HI

A ri si n g,

" [T :'f$: :Z'il,i::Alffi -", D er h i)

Itcm No.04

Smt. Meera

V

M/s Shubham Housing Development

Finance Company Limited & others

21.10.2026 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain Present: Ms. Akansha Kapoor, Advocate for appellant through VC

Sh. Subodh Kumar Singh, Advocate for respondent no.1 through VC

Sh. Chandrakant Tiwari, Advocate for auction purchaser through VC

Sh. Girish Verrna, Advocate for proposed respondent no.4 through VC

This matter is taken up through I-Iybrid hearing.

1. Ms. Akansha Kapoor, Counsel for the appellant during the coursa of argument in the application for condonation of delay (I.A. bearing No. 60112U24 and on the appeal stated that the S.A. bearing No. 37012022 is still pending before DRT-II, Delhi and listed for 26.10.2026. She fuither stated that the appellant i; owner of the property bearing l{ouse No. E-73, measuring B0 sq. yds. situated at Khasra No.15/8, Revenue Estate of village Matiala, E-Block, Mansa Ram Park, l-lttam Nagar, New Delhi while thc mortgage with thc respondent no.l is Flat No. 74A, situated at Khasra No.15/8, Itevenue llstate of village Matiala, E-3lock, Mansa Itam Park, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi.

2. Sh. Subodh Kumar Singh, Counsel for respondent no.1 stated that after taking the possession, rnoftgaged properly has already put to auction and possession is also handed over to the auction purchaser. Sh. Chandrakant Tiwar-, Counsel for auction purchaser also stated that the auction purchaser has sold the subject propcrty.

Page 1 of 2

3. In thcsc circumstanccs and in vicw of thc submission mado by thc Counscls ftrr thc rcspcctivc partics, thc prcsent appcal is disposcd of with thc libcrty to thc appcllant to filc appropriatc application bcforc DI{l' for implcarlment of the subscquent purohascr and also to seek injunction frorn creating third party intcrest in thc subjcct propcrly. If thc said application is filcd within two wceks, thc DItl'- II, Delhi is directed to considcr and decide the said application as carly as possible without any clclay in accordancc with law aftcr giving thc opportuniLy for hcaring to thc contcsting partics.

4. 'l'hc copy of this ordcr bc scnt to DIt'l'-II, Dclhi lor information anrl compliancc. (Dr. Jr n'^ 9d- r Kumar.Iain) Chairperson -N

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead