Securities Appellate Tribunal

Reliance Industries Ltd vs Securities and Exchange Board of India on 16 December 2015

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

MUMBAI

Date of Decision: 16.12.2015

Appeal No. 306 of 2014

Reliance Industries Limited

3rd Floor, Maker Chamber IV, 222,

Nariman Point,

Mumbai- 400 021

…Appellant

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India,

SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block,

Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),

Mumbai -400 051

…Respondent

Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohan Rajadhyaksha, Mr. Rajendra Barot and Mr. Divij Kishore, Advocates i/b AZB &

Partners, for the Appellant.

Mr. Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mihir Mody and Ms. Shruti Chiniwar, Advocates i/b K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.

CORAM: Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Jog Singh, Member Per: Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)

Page 1 of 2

1. Appellant is aggrieved by the adjudication order passed by the Adjudicating Officer of Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI” for short) on 08.08.2014. By that order penalty of ` 1 crore is imposed on the appellant for allegedly violating Section 23A(a) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and penalty of ` 12 crore is imposed on the appellant for allegedly violating Section 23E of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956.

2. One of the major ground taken in the appeal is that in paragraph 29 of the impugned order, the Adjudicating Officer has taken into account

2 all the 12 crore shares relatable to the warrants in question while computing the Diluted Earnings Per Share (DEPS) for the 6 quarters in question. This factual position is not disputed by SEBI. In view of the language of AS-20, taking into account all the 12 crore shares relatable to the warrants in question while computing the DEPS does not appear to be correct.

3. Since computation of DEPS itself is not in consonance with AS-20, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter of a de novo consideration, leaving all contentions of the parties open. It would be open to SEBI to issue supplementary show cause notice, if any, within a period of 8 weeks from today as requested by counsel for SEBI.

4. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.

Sd/- Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer

Sd/-

Jog Singh

Member 16.12.2015 Prepared & Compared By: PK

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead