Securities Appellate Tribunal

Rose Valley Real Estates and Construction Limited & Others vs Securities and Exchange Board of India on 15 December 2014

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

MUMBAI

Appeal No.233 of 2014

Date of decision : 15/12/2014

1. Rose Valley Real Estates and

Construction Limited

2. Goutam Kundu

3. Shibamoy Dutta

4. Abir Kundu

5. Ram Lal Goswami Address at : Godrej Water Site, Tower No.1, 2nd Floor, Office No.201 & 202, Plot No.5, Block-DP, Sector-5, Salt Lake City, Kolkata – 700 091.

… Appellants

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No.C4-A, “G” Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051.

… Respondent

Page 1 of 2

Mr. Sudipto Sarkar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Moushmi Bhattacharya, Mr. Arup Bhattacharya, Ms. Ravela D’souza and Mr. Ajay Hailkar, Advocates i/b Bachubhai Munim & Co. for Appellants.

Mr. Kevic Setalvad, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rushin Kapadia, Advocate i/b K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.

CORAM :

Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer

A. S. Lamba, Member

Per : Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)

1. This Appeal is filed to challenge the order passed by Whole Time Member of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on 18th June, 2014 whereby Appellants are directed to wind up its Collective Investment Scheme and refund moneys collected by it under the scheme with returns which are due to investors as per the terms of offer within a period of three

-2- months from the date of the said order. Counsel for the Appellant fairly states that the Appellants are ready and willing to comply with the order passed by the Whole Time Member. However, in view of SEBI restraining the Appellants from dealing with their properties in its ex-parte order, Appellants are not in a position to comply with the order. Counsel for SEBI states that once final order is passed, ex-parte ad-interim order gets merged into the final order and, therefore, for the purpose of implementing the final order of 18th June, 2014, Appellants would be entitled to sell their properties and utilize the sale proceeds only for making payment to the investors of the Appellant No.1. Accordingly, we permit the Appellants to sell the properties belonging to them under the supervision of SEBI by expressly making it clear that the sale proceeds received on sale of the properties shall be utilized only for the purpose of making payment to investors of Appellant No.1. Appellants are directed to dispose of the properties belonging to them as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of six months from today. Subject to the Appellants complying with the impugned order dated 18th June, 2014 within a period of six months from today, SEBI shall not take any further proceedings against Appellants.

2. Appeal is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.

Sd/-

Justice J.P. Devadhar

Presiding Officer

Sd/-

A.S. Lamba

Member

15/12/2014 Prepared & compared by-ddg

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead