Securities Appellate Tribunal

Robinson Worldwide Trade Ltd & Others vs Securities and Exchange Board of India on 22 December 2010

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

MUMBAI

Misc. Application No. 118 of 2010

And

Appeal No. 114 of 2010

Date of decision: 22.12.2010

1) Robinson Worldwide Trade Ltd. Having its office at 806, Saffron Complex, Panchvati, Eliis Bridge, Ambawadi Road, Ahmedabad.

2) Ramanlal Nagjibhai Trivedi Having its office at 806, Saffron Complex, Panchvati, Eliis Bridge, Ambawadi Road, Ahmedabad.

3) Yasmin G. Arab Having its office at 806, Saffron Complex, Panchvati, Eliis Bridge, Ambawadi Road, Ahmedabad.

4) Rabia Begum G. Arab Having its office at 806, Saffron Complex, Panchvati, Eliis Bridge, Ambawadi Road, Ahmedabad.

……Appellants

Versus

Page 1 of 3

Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400051.

…… Respondent

Ms. Anamika Dubey, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. Kersi Dastoor, Advocate with Mr. Karan Vyas, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice N. K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer Samar Ray, Member

P. K. Malhotra, Member

Per : Justice N. K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer (Oral)

This appeal is directed against the order dated March 31, 2010 passed by the adjudicating officer imposing a monetary penalty of ` 10 lacs on the appellants for violating Regulations 3 and 4(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India

2 (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003 and Regulation 7(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997. During the pendency of the appeal the appellants filed an application with the respondent Board for a consent order in terms of the circular dated April 20, 2007. The application was processed and placed before the High Powered Committee set up for the purpose. The appellants had offered to settle the issue on payment of ` 15 lacs without admitting or denying the allegations. The terms as offered were accepted by the High Powered Committee and they have also been accepted by two whole time members of the respondent Board. By letter dated December 21, 2010, the appellants have been advised to pay a sum of ` 15 lacs for the settlement of the issue as per the terms offered by them. The appellants through their counsel undertake to deposit the aforesaid amount with the respondent Board on or before December 31, 2010.

Page 2 of 3

In view of the undertaking given by the appellants and having regard to the fact that the terms as offered by the appellants have been accepted by the respondent Board, we dispose of the appeal as per the terms accepted by the respondent Board for the settlement of the issue. The appellants are directed to deposit the aforesaid amount before the due date. The impugned order stands modified accordingly. No costs.

Sd/-

Justice N. K. Sodhi

Presiding Officer

Sd/-

Samar Ray

Member

Sd/-

P. K. Malhotra

Member 22.12.2010 ptm

Prepared & Compared by PTM

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead