Securities Appellate Tribunal

Exdon Trading Co. Ltd. & Others vs Securities and Exchange Board of India on 22 December 2010

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

MUMBAI

Misc. Application No. 117 of 2010

And

Appeal No. 89 of 2010

Date of decision: 22.12.2010

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1) Exdon Trading Co. Ltd. 20, Western India Building, Veer Savarkar Marg, Prabhadevi, Mumbai – 400 020.

2) Ashok Hiralal Shah Exdon Trading Co. Ltd. 20, Western India Building, Veer Savarkar Marg, Prabhadevi, Mumbai – 400 020.

3) Hiralal Popatlal Shah Exdon Trading Co. Ltd. 20, Western India Building, Veer Savarkar Marg, Prabhadevi, Mumbai – 400 020.

……Appellants

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400051.

…… Respondent

Ms. Anamika Dubey, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. Kersi Dastoor, Advocate with Mr. Karan Vyas, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice N. K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer Samar Ray, Member

P. K. Malhotra, Member

Per : Justice N. K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer (Oral)

This appeal is directed against the order dated March 31, 2010 passed by the adjudicating officer imposing a monetary penalty of ` 8 lacs on the appellants for violating Regulations 3 and 4(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003. During the pendency of the appeal the appellants filed an

2 application for a consent order in terms of the circular dated April 20, 2007 issued by the respondent Board proposing to settle the issue without admitting or denying the allegations. As per the revised terms of settlement offered by the appellants, they have undertaken to pay a sum of ` 12 lacs. The High Powered Committee set up for the purpose has accepted the terms as offered by the appellants and the matter was placed before two whole time members of the respondent Board. The respondent Board has also agreed to the terms of consent as proposed by the appellants and by its letter dated December 21, 2010 advised the appellants to deposit a sum of ` 12 lacs in terms of the settlement arrived at. The appellants through their counsel undertake to deposit this amount on or before December 31, 2010.

In view of the undertaking given by the appellants, the appeal is disposed of as per the terms of settlement accepted by the respondent Board with a direction to the appellants to deposit the aforesaid amount before the due date. The impugned order stands modified accordingly. No costs.

Sd/-

Justice N. K. Sodhi

Presiding Officer

Sd/-

Samar Ray

Member

Sd/-

P. K. Malhotra

Member 22.12.2010 ptm

Prepared & Compared by PTM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead