Securities Appellate Tribunal
Fincap Portfolio Ltd. vs Securities and Exchange Board of India on 28 November 2007
IN THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
Miscellaneous Application No.36 of 2007 And Appeal No.19 of 2007
Date of Decision: 28.11.2007
Fincap Portfolio Ltd. ...... Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India ..…Respondent
Present : Shri Joby Mathew, Advocate with Shri Deepak Dhane, Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant Shri N.H. Munjjee, Advocate for the Respondent
CORAM
Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer
Arun Bhargava, Member
Utpal Bhattacharya, Member
Per: Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer (Oral)
Page 1 of 2
This appeal is directed against an order dated January 4, 2007 passed by the whole time member of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (for short “the Board”) suspending the certificate of registration of the appellant for a period of one month. The appellant is a stock broker and a member of the National Stock Exchange.
2. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant filed an application for a consent order before the Board which was put up before the High Powered Advisory Committee seeking its approval in terms of the circular
.2. dated April 20, 2007 issued by the Board. The terms of settlement as proposed by the appellant were examined by the aforesaid committee which has recommended that the dispute with the appellant be settled on payment of Rs.2.25 lacs. The approval granted by the committee was considered by two whole time members of the Board who have in principle, agreed to the terms recommended by the committee.
3. In view of the aforesaid the appellant has filed the present application in terms of the aforesaid circular with a prayer that the appeal be disposed of as per the consent terms arrived at between the parties and approved by the committee and the Board.
4. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the consent terms. In the circumstances of the case, it would be just and equitable to dispose of the appeal on the proposed terms. We order accordingly. The appellant shall remain bound by the undertaking given by it before the committee.
The appeal and the application stand disposed of as above. No costs.
Sd/-
Justice N.K. Sodhi
Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Arun Bhargava
Member
Sd/-
Utpal Bhattacharya
Member
RHN 28.11.2007
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…