Mose Sarefa Bibi vs INDIAN BANK on 19 August 2025

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI

<table border="1" style="width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;"> <thead> <tr> <th style="width: 20%;">Case No.</th> <th colspan="2" style="text-align: center;">Order Sheet (continuation)</th> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align: top;"> <b>Dy. No.</b><br/> <b>336/2025(MA)</b><br/> In Dy. No.<br/> 148/2025 </td> <td colspan="2" style="text-align: center;"> <b>MOSE SAREFA BIBI</b><br/> Vs<br/> <b>INDIAN BANK</b> </td> </tr> <tr> <th style="width: 20%;">Date of the order</th> <th style="width: 60%;">Order with signature</th> <th style="width: 20%;">Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary.</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td style="vertical-align: top;"> <b>19.08.2025</b> </td> <td> <p><u>Order No: 3 :</u></p> <p style="text-indent: 40px;">Case records called out as per previous order.</p> <p style="text-indent: 40px;">Today fixed for removal of defects mentioned in order dated 14.08.2025.</p> <p style="text-indent: 40px;">None appears today.</p> <p style="text-indent: 40px;">Ld. Adv. Mr. Mahim Sasmal appeared on VC on last date and undertook to rectify the defects.</p> <p style="text-indent: 40px;">Defects exists. Hence, Registry has no option and hereby <u>declined</u> the matter in terms of Regulation 9(4) of Debts Recovery Tribunal Regulation, 2024.</p> <p style="text-indent: 40px;">Applicant is at liberty to appeal against instant order before the Hon'ble Presiding Officer, DRT Siliguri within 15 days of this order under Rule 5 (5) of the DRT Procedure Rules, 1993.</p> <div style="text-align: right; margin-top: 20px;"> <br/> <b>Registrar</b><br/> DRT-Siliguri </div> </td> <td></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>