Central Administrative Tribunal
DIN DAYAL GOSWAMI vs RAILWAY on 30 December 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 14 Diary No: 13729/2025 [ REGULARISATION ] With MA Joining Together Court No.: 3 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 30/12/2025 DIN DAYAL GOSWAMI Vs RAILWAY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Amit Anand For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Bijendra Singh Sharma Order of The Tribunal Learned counsel for the applicant states that except applicant no. 5 Dr. Surjeet Singh Verma, all the applicants are working as a doctor in their reflecting zones. The same is vehemently opposed by Mr. Bijendra Singh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents who appears on advance service, as there is no clarity in the pleadings as well as the documents produced on record as to whether the applicants except applicant no. 5 are working or not as on date. Learned counsel for the respondents further states that there is no clarity that their period of contract is already stands over or not in respect to other 14 applicants. Be that as it may. If the applicants are being allowed to work beyond the stipulated period as contended by the respondents, status quo, if any, to be maintained in respect of the applicants till the next date of hearing. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Bijendra Singh Sharma, learned counsel, who appears on advance service, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Re-list on 02.01.2026.
Manish Garg Member (J) Shilpi Gupta ( steno )