Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

UNITED BANK OF INDIA vs GAGAN RAI on 22 January 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Page No.

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL - SILIGURI

ORDER SHEET

(Continuation)

Case No. \_\_\_\_\_

Vs

<table border="1" style="width: 100%; text-align: center;"> <tr> <td>IA/25 &amp; 26/2020 in TOA/1212/18</td> </tr> </table>

<table border="1" style="width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;"> <thead> <tr> <th style="width: 15%; text-align: center;">Date of Order</th> <th style="width: 70%; text-align: center;">Order with Signature</th> <th style="width: 15%; text-align: center;">Office action with date and dated Signature of parties when necessary</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td style="vertical-align: top; padding: 5px;"> <div style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 2px; display: inline-block;">Dated: 22.01.2020</div> </td> <td style="vertical-align: top; padding: 10px;"> <p style="text-align: center;"><b>United Bank of India</b></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><b>Vs</b></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><b>Gagan Rai</b></p> <p><b>Present :-</b></p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Mr. P. Roy Sarkar, Ld. Advocate for Applicant bank.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">None for the defendant.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Ld. Counsel for the applicant Bank files instant IA/25/2020 with submission that matter has already been settled between the parties through compromise settlement process and defendant has paid the entire settlement amount of Rs. 60,00,000/- to the bank with no dues. Applicant Bank has issued No due certificate dated 21.02.2019 and also praying for withdrawal of the matter as settled.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Applicant bank has filed a separate IA/26/2020 with the prayer to refund of court fees.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">In the above circumstances nothing remains to be adjudicated. The IA/25/2020 is allowed and the TOA/1212/2018 is disposed off as withdrawn.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Applicant Bank is entitled for refund of Court Fees as admissible under the provision of DRT (Refund of Court Fee) Rules, 2013 and approach Registry for scrutiny and further submission for approval.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">Copy of this order be given to both the parties.</p> <p style="padding-left: 40px;">File be consigned to the Record Room.</p> <div style="text-align: right; margin-top: 20px;"> <br/> <b>(D. S. Mahra)</b><br/> Presiding Officer<br/> DRT-Siliguri </div> </td> <td style="vertical-align: top; padding: 10px;"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead