Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

Indian Bank Erstwhile ALLAHABAD BANK vs Sujit Ray And Anr on 21 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Page No.**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL - SILIGURI****ORDER SHEET**

(Continuation)

Case No. \_\_\_\_\_

Vs

**MA/12/2020 In SA/73/2019**

<table border="1"> <thead> <tr> <th data-bbox="151 218 218 283">Date of Order</th> <th data-bbox="218 218 708 283">Order with Signature</th> <th data-bbox="708 218 839 283">Office action with date and dated Signature of parties when necessary</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td data-bbox="151 283 218 972">21.12.2020</td> <td data-bbox="218 283 708 972"> <p style="text-align: center;"><b>Sujit Roy &amp; Ors</b><br/><b>Vs</b><br/><b>Indian Bank &amp; Ors</b></p> <p>The matter has been conducted through Virtual Court/online.</p> <p>Ms. Sudha Singh, Ld. Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Ajith Kr. Mishra, Ld. Advocate for the applicants.</p> <p>Mr. P.K. Sikder, Ld. Advocate along with Mr. A. Mukopadhaya Manager (Law) appears for the respondent bank.</p> <p>Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the matter was settled at Rs. 7.00 lakhs in the Lok Adalat and Rs. 1.75 Lakh was immediately deposited by the applicant in the Lok Adalat. The rest of the amount as per the said Lok Adalat settlement was required to be paid on or before 31.03.2019, but due to pandemic the rest of the amount could not be deposited.</p> <p>Ld. Counsel for the applicants submits that the borrower will abide by the undertaking given in the joint compromise petition filed in the Lok Adalat.</p> <p>Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submits that as the applicant failed to deposit the amount as per the compromise took place in the Lok Adalat, the respondent bank is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.</p> <p>Heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties.</p> <p>The applicant is allowed to make the entire compromise amount with interest on delayed payment on or before 31.03.2021. If the applicant fails to make the entire compromise amount alongwith interest on or before 31/3/2021, the respondent bank is at liberty to sell the mortgaged property without reference to the Tribunal and Interim order shall be vacated.</p> <p>With the above observation, M.A. No. 12/2020 stands disposed of.</p> <div style="text-align: right;"> <br/> <b>(D. S. Mahra)</b><br/> Presiding Officer<br/> DRT-Siliguri </div> </td> <td data-bbox="708 283 839 972"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead